http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2014/06/ukraine-international-war-criminal-obama-putin-2.html
Monday, 30 June 2014
Sunday, 29 June 2014
Friday, 27 June 2014
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.co.uk/2014/06/bitcoins-to-become-legal-currency-in.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+MishsGlobalEconomicTrendAnalysis+%28Mish%27s+Global+Economic+Trend+Analysis%29
wow....this is huge if it goes through...I'm really surprised the banksters haven't been able stop this.
wow....this is huge if it goes through...I'm really surprised the banksters haven't been able stop this.
Wednesday, 25 June 2014
Monday, 23 June 2014
http://thecrux.com/the-united-states-of-debt-total-debt-in-america-just-hit-an-outrageous-new-record/
" If you go back 40 years ago, total debt in America was sitting at about 2.2 trillion dollars. Somehow over the past four decades we have allowed the total amount of debt in the United States to get approximately 27 times larger."
hmmmmm when did we come off the gold standard ? :-)
Sunday, 22 June 2014
Friday, 20 June 2014
Thursday, 19 June 2014
http://www.testosteronepit.com/home/2014/6/19/the-fed-rules-metrics-and-ratios-are-just-for-decoration.html
And so we have a series of geniuses: Greenspan who said that the very concept of a national housing bubble in the US was impossible just as the national housing bubble was inflating to monstrous proportions; Bernanke who said that the consequences of sub-prime lending were “contained” just as the consequences of subprime lending were eating up the banks from the inside out; and Yellen who now told us that complacency is nothing to worry about.
So we sally deeper into the Yellen era, which is the same as the Bernanke era, in that the Fed – and other central banks, for that matter – is the only thing worth looking at. Central banks rule. Practically nothing else matters. Metrics and ratios are just for decoration. Markets as a means of price discovery no longer exist.
And so we have a series of geniuses: Greenspan who said that the very concept of a national housing bubble in the US was impossible just as the national housing bubble was inflating to monstrous proportions; Bernanke who said that the consequences of sub-prime lending were “contained” just as the consequences of subprime lending were eating up the banks from the inside out; and Yellen who now told us that complacency is nothing to worry about.
So we sally deeper into the Yellen era, which is the same as the Bernanke era, in that the Fed – and other central banks, for that matter – is the only thing worth looking at. Central banks rule. Practically nothing else matters. Metrics and ratios are just for decoration. Markets as a means of price discovery no longer exist.
Wednesday, 18 June 2014
Tuesday, 17 June 2014
http://www.blacklistednews.com/Rothschild_Crony_Capitalist_Summit_Plots_Against_Free_Markets_/35955/0/38/38/Y/M.html?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
"It is true that the world and humanity face major problems that must be addressed — even in terms of pseudo-capitalists exploiting the population via government to benefit themselves. The root of those afflictions, though, has been deliberately misdiagnosed by the bigwigs who met in London. The prescriptions offered at the Rothschild summit will only lead to more exploitation, more tyranny, more centralized and less accountable government, more unearned wealth for the establishment, and more human misery. What humanity really needs are freer markets, honest money as opposed to cartel-owned central-banking scams, honest government, more freedom, more faith, and respect for individual rights"
"It is true that the world and humanity face major problems that must be addressed — even in terms of pseudo-capitalists exploiting the population via government to benefit themselves. The root of those afflictions, though, has been deliberately misdiagnosed by the bigwigs who met in London. The prescriptions offered at the Rothschild summit will only lead to more exploitation, more tyranny, more centralized and less accountable government, more unearned wealth for the establishment, and more human misery. What humanity really needs are freer markets, honest money as opposed to cartel-owned central-banking scams, honest government, more freedom, more faith, and respect for individual rights"
Monday, 16 June 2014
Sunday, 15 June 2014
Saturday, 14 June 2014
Thursday, 12 June 2014
http://the-tap.blogspot.co.uk/2010/02/who-owns-bank-of-england.html
"In 1977, the Bank set up a wholly owned subsidiary called Bank of England Nominees Limited, (BOEN), a private limited company, with 2 of its 100 £1 shares issued. According to its Memorandum & Articles of Association, its objectives are:- “To act as Nominee or agent or attorney either solely or jointly with others, for any person or persons, partnership, company, corporation, government, state, organisation, sovereign, province, authority, or public body, or any group or association of them….”
Bank of England Nominees Limited was granted an exemption by Edmund Dell, Secretary of State for Trade, from the disclosure requirements under Section 27(9) of the Companies Act 1976 , because, “it was considered undesirable that the disclosure requirements should apply to certain categories of shareholders.” The Bank of England is also protected by its Royal Charter status, and the Official Secrets Act.
In other words, you and I are not allowed to know who the shareholders are who own the company which carries out Central Banking in the UK. Some people say that Mandelson's buddies, the Rothschilds are major shareholders. Also the Queen. But the information is secret. We are not allowed to know."
Disgraceful..........
"In 1977, the Bank set up a wholly owned subsidiary called Bank of England Nominees Limited, (BOEN), a private limited company, with 2 of its 100 £1 shares issued. According to its Memorandum & Articles of Association, its objectives are:- “To act as Nominee or agent or attorney either solely or jointly with others, for any person or persons, partnership, company, corporation, government, state, organisation, sovereign, province, authority, or public body, or any group or association of them….”
Bank of England Nominees Limited was granted an exemption by Edmund Dell, Secretary of State for Trade, from the disclosure requirements under Section 27(9) of the Companies Act 1976 , because, “it was considered undesirable that the disclosure requirements should apply to certain categories of shareholders.” The Bank of England is also protected by its Royal Charter status, and the Official Secrets Act.
In other words, you and I are not allowed to know who the shareholders are who own the company which carries out Central Banking in the UK. Some people say that Mandelson's buddies, the Rothschilds are major shareholders. Also the Queen. But the information is secret. We are not allowed to know."
Disgraceful..........
Wednesday, 11 June 2014
Tuesday, 10 June 2014
I dont know if it will pan out like this but I do believe that next time it regains the 200 dma UK investors need to be holding gold.........there is a huge dichotomy between MSM enthusiasm for the "recovery" and the real state of things,especially if Jim Willie is even half right (see video in previous post)
http://www.safehaven.com/article/34122/educating-the-fed-and-climate-alarmists?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+safehaven%2Fall-articles+%28Safehaven+-+Most+Recent+Articles%29
The combination of central banking, macro-economic theories, ambitious bureaucracies and gullible politicians has created a century of chronic and massive currency depreciation. The consequence has been a series of dislocating asset inflations. Initially, the Fed's job definition was to prevent financial convulsions that precipitated recessions. There have been 18 bear markets and recessions since the Fed opened its doors in 1914.
Despite the sorry record, the establishment has never doubted the perfection of the Federal Reserve System. On the inevitable Classic Crashes such as in 1929, the Fed was not criticized but those running it got the blame. Blame the guy, not the system.
The combination of central banking, macro-economic theories, ambitious bureaucracies and gullible politicians has created a century of chronic and massive currency depreciation. The consequence has been a series of dislocating asset inflations. Initially, the Fed's job definition was to prevent financial convulsions that precipitated recessions. There have been 18 bear markets and recessions since the Fed opened its doors in 1914.
Despite the sorry record, the establishment has never doubted the perfection of the Federal Reserve System. On the inevitable Classic Crashes such as in 1929, the Fed was not criticized but those running it got the blame. Blame the guy, not the system.
Monday, 9 June 2014
http://www.maxkeiser.com/2014/06/rbs-bail-in-risk-danger-of-failing-due-to-100-billion-black-hole/
" According to The Independent
on Sunday, a new study of the bank, which brought the UK to the brink
of financial ruin, reveals RBS still has a £100 billion “black hole” in
its finances due to “five broad areas of alleged criminality and
wrongdoing”.
Financial journalist Ian Fraser, who wrote Shredded: Inside RBS, The Bank That Broke Britain, said: “The result has been that, at the time of writing, RBS is probably a worse bank than it was under Fred Goodwin.” "
Sunday, 8 June 2014
http://solarcycles.net/2014/06/08/piecing-it-all-together/
"New highs in small caps, new highs in leverage, a reversal out of defensive sectors and assets, and/or repairs to volume and breadth would make me abandon that ‘best fit’ and conclude that the sun is not yet done with its speculation incitement. Whilst I can’t rule out a more definitive, crazy parabolic to erupt here, as has been typical at historic solar maxima, I just doubt it because of the lack of demographic support combined with the levels already reached in the likes of margin debt, rydex, valuations, investors intelligence and more. If a sharp terminal up-leg can actually occur from here on continued low volume, without the need for a stream of new buyers, then it would be a game of confidence in which the fear of losing out on stellar gains drives prices higher in a feedback loop despite participants knowing it is manic and unsustainable. If that were to occur then it would make the ultimate correction even bigger, but prior to that it would be a challenge to both bulls and bears: play the danger or suffer the drawdown. What seems clear though from history is that leverage would need to accompany such rises, and it appears that leverage already peaked out. However, there is a possible middle path, in which prices can eek out some more gains in June/July whilst not straying too far and honouring most of the above."
John Hampson
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)