Tuesday, 27 September 2016
Monday, 26 September 2016
Sunday, 25 September 2016
Peter Hitchens/Mail Online
Syria's 'WMD moment'. Don't be duped again
Almost
everyone (barring a tiny knot of deluded losers) knows that Saddam
Hussein had no WMD. Most people now grasp that Colonel Gaddafi wasn’t
planning a massacre in Benghazi or ordering his troops to engage in mass
rapes.
How long will it be before we also grasp that neither Russia nor Syria bombed a UN aid convoy in Aleppo?
This
incident, about which almost no independently testable, checkable facts
have yet been produced, is the WMD of Syria. If we all fall for it,
then we shall very soon find ourselves embroiled in the most dangerous
international confrontation since the Cuban missile crisis.
Under
immense pressure from the despots of Saudi Arabia, the USA will not
give up its efforts to overthrow the Syrian government. It is clear that
it is now prepared to risk an open confrontation with Moscow to achieve
this. Why? Who do they think they are, and how can their cause be so
good that they take such risks?
The
deliberate sabotage of a workable peace deal in Syria (opposed from the
start by the Pentagon) is one of the scandals of our age. There was a
chance we might end the misery of millions, and it was thrown away.
We
in Britain must resist being dragged into a Syrian war, not least
because, if we are, it will not be long before any troops we send there
are being hounded in their own country for alleged war crimes. We’ve
been fooled enough by this propaganda. Don’t be bamboozled again.
Saturday, 24 September 2016
Thursday, 22 September 2016
http://wolfstreet.com/2016/09/21/oecd-warns-fed-boj-ecb-of-asset-bubbles-risks-to-financial-stability-pinpoints-us-stocks-real-estate/
this is a good article,but I like this from the comments section,even better
this is a good article,but I like this from the comments section,even better
cdr
September 22, 2016 at 6:13 am
d,
The patient (we in the US) is responding to the drug (idiotic monetary policy) just as they expected and intended. The results you, I, and 99.9% of us want are just not the same thing they want. The Fed is protecting the ‘financial markets’, aka bubbles and their reputations and a few very rich people and the politicians who work for them.
Yes, they are protecting their reputations. They MUST publicly deny the existence of bubbles because if they admitted even one that they caused, then they would have to explain too many uncomfortable things that would crack the incompetence door much wider.
Even admitting 1 bubble would require them to provide explanations to:
1) If their theories are so good, why do they excel at bubbles in financial markets and asset prices and ignore benefits to the real economy
2) Why do they continually apply these theories if they have unintended consequences of such magnitude?
3) Why do they apply these theories over and over again if they don’t work?
4) How did “Going Bigger For Longer If It Does Not Work Today” become the mantra to ignore failure by defining it’s failure only if you admit your mistake and stop what you’ve been doing. Or, anything that’s not success is never failure … it’s always success, just not as much of a success as they wanted.
Finally, they can’t raise rates and change policy. The Fed is in a prisoner’s dilemma with the ECB, BOJ, BOE, and most minor central banks. The only reason monetary policy can crush interest rates so well is that they all are doing it in a coordinated manner. If the Fed broke ranks and tried to normalize rates, they would ruin the schemes the other two employ … The ECB monetizing bad euro debt to keep the plate spinning a little longer and the Japanese doing god knows what. The Fed doesn’t want to be the one that explodes the sovereign debt bubble. How would they explain that?
It’s not complicated, but there is a lot of BS that surrounds the bad policy they implement.
The patient (we in the US) is responding to the drug (idiotic monetary policy) just as they expected and intended. The results you, I, and 99.9% of us want are just not the same thing they want. The Fed is protecting the ‘financial markets’, aka bubbles and their reputations and a few very rich people and the politicians who work for them.
Yes, they are protecting their reputations. They MUST publicly deny the existence of bubbles because if they admitted even one that they caused, then they would have to explain too many uncomfortable things that would crack the incompetence door much wider.
Even admitting 1 bubble would require them to provide explanations to:
1) If their theories are so good, why do they excel at bubbles in financial markets and asset prices and ignore benefits to the real economy
2) Why do they continually apply these theories if they have unintended consequences of such magnitude?
3) Why do they apply these theories over and over again if they don’t work?
4) How did “Going Bigger For Longer If It Does Not Work Today” become the mantra to ignore failure by defining it’s failure only if you admit your mistake and stop what you’ve been doing. Or, anything that’s not success is never failure … it’s always success, just not as much of a success as they wanted.
Finally, they can’t raise rates and change policy. The Fed is in a prisoner’s dilemma with the ECB, BOJ, BOE, and most minor central banks. The only reason monetary policy can crush interest rates so well is that they all are doing it in a coordinated manner. If the Fed broke ranks and tried to normalize rates, they would ruin the schemes the other two employ … The ECB monetizing bad euro debt to keep the plate spinning a little longer and the Japanese doing god knows what. The Fed doesn’t want to be the one that explodes the sovereign debt bubble. How would they explain that?
It’s not complicated, but there is a lot of BS that surrounds the bad policy they implement.
Wednesday, 21 September 2016
Sunday, 18 September 2016
this week is one of Gann's most important weeks in the year when" the
sun crosses the equator and Fall officially begins and stocks make
important changes in trend"
(WD Gann The Stock Market Course,1935)
for a move lower generally I think we need to see something like this in the Nasdaq,which was strong last week
ie a spike through the upper Boll and then reverse hard
IBB has also been showing relative strength and is looking like a 3rd attempt to break 300 (25% off the low)
(WD Gann The Stock Market Course,1935)
for a move lower generally I think we need to see something like this in the Nasdaq,which was strong last week
ie a spike through the upper Boll and then reverse hard
IBB has also been showing relative strength and is looking like a 3rd attempt to break 300 (25% off the low)
Saturday, 17 September 2016
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/egyptian-911-inside-job-state-media-war-on-terror-isis-made-up-al-ahram-noha-al-sharnoubi-columnist-a7308926.html
According to the report, “journalists are obliged on national security grounds to report only the official version of ‘terrorist’ attacks” under an anti-terrorism law passed in 2015.
According to the report, “journalists are obliged on national security grounds to report only the official version of ‘terrorist’ attacks” under an anti-terrorism law passed in 2015.
Tuesday, 13 September 2016
Monday, 12 September 2016
Wednesday, 7 September 2016
Saturday, 3 September 2016
Friday, 2 September 2016
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)